It’s that time of year….you know, the one where someone from
Network Rail or some BBC reporter stands
in a street full of snowdrifts and tells us we’ve got no
trains/electricity/gas/sanity because of “the wrong kind of snow” (who knew?).
Over much of the UK and Europe, people have been waking up (or even going to
bed) to a blanket of white. Most of them seem to have eschewed the idea of
grabbing a blanket, hot water bottle or extra firewood in favour of a camera.
Facebook is a veritable winter wonderland of “views from my window” shots of
whiteness. I am typing this very blog entry whilst gazing out onto my white-ish
back garden. Spots of colour are peeking through, though, ‘cos it’s already
melting. I’d add a photo but it’s already too late and one person’s
snow-covered garden looks very much like another’s, so I feel I’m sparing you.
But I’ve just found out that the snow isn’t the only thing
of which we can have a wrong kind. No, apparently, there’s also the wrong kind
of French.
My morning scan of some of the Internet’s vast number of
Francophile forums revealed that a number of people appear to be having problems mastering
the French language because, back in the UK, they’d poured their hearts and
their money into learning the wrong kind
of French. And to top it all, the French haven’t been sent the memo, so they’re
being most uncooperative and speaking some lazy colloquial version of their own
language, showing no regard for those who have learned proper French as she is
spoke. In a typo sent from heaven, one
person complained that her French acquaintances appeared to be speaking
“patios”. An interesting thought, but
about as unlikely as a talking conservatory.
I’ve been to this place called Patios, though. And no, it’s
not a Greek Island. People aren’t speaking patois as often as they are slang,
and I well remember having to come to terms with the realisation that French
slang has an alternative word for almost everything. On my first long-term stay
in France in the mid-1970’s, I met so much slang that I was initially convinced
I’d been sent to the wrong country. After a while, though, it does fall into
place. And it’s not nearly as confusing as discovering that your college tutor,
happily married to the same woman for a fair number of years, calls his wife
“Vous”. Now, if that doesn’t fly in the face of what the textbooks say, I don’t
know what does.
Now that I’ve become what might loosely be described as a
“teacher” (I admit to feeling somewhat embarrassed to use the term in case a
real teacher comes along and I get found out), I do see both sides of this
situation. Of course, when we learn a foreign language, we are taught the
correct way of using the grammar and of forming sentences with grammatically
proper structures. But, as we know with our native language, rules are made to
be broken. I’ve just counted the number of sentences in this post that start
with a conjunction, for example, and if I was a better person, I might feel shame.
But I’m not ;-)
With my adult learners, though, I seem to run into a regular
problem. Many have a strong foundation in French, well-remembered from their
schooldays. They also have the benefit of maturity and wisdom commensurate with
their age. Why, then, do they so often seem to go into some sort of mental
meltdown if I tell them that they MAY have learned to say “X”, but that the
majority of French people say “Y”?? Sometimes, I will get as far as being able to convince
people to use a more relaxed and informal turn of phrase, only to meet them
again for the next lesson and find that they’ve reverted to speaking like Louis
XIV because that’s what they learned thirty years ago.
There is a beautiful illustration of this phenomenon in one
of my favourite French films ever, “Etre et Avoir”, (To be and to have) the story of a teacher in
a single-classroom school in rural France. Originally made as a documentary, it
charts a year in the life of this school and its extraordinarily dedicated
teacher, Georges Lopez. If you haven’t seen it, I encourage you to do so. Even
with subtitles it’s well worth watching. It contains the following scene, which goes some way to show
that the French do try, very hard and from an early age, to learn the RIGHT
kind of French, but unfortunately, the wrong kind of French is deeply
ingrained. Meanwhile, this side of the Channel, we’re learning the right kind
of French and, if numbers of British migrants to France increase enough, who
knows, one day we might be able to save the French language from dumbing
down…..
I can’t find a clip of this with English subtitles, and you’ll
need to watch it from about 2 minutes 20 into the clip, but the children are
using the word “ami” or “amie” (friend) to learn the difference between
masculine and feminine noun endings. However, one small boy is NOT prepared to
give up easily on using the word “copain”
(mate). He will probably be in his late teens by now (as the film was
released in 2002), and actively engaged in confusing well-meaning British
people who have learned all about “ami” and “amie”, but are blissfully ignorant
of “copain” and “copine”…
Oh, thanks for posting that wonderful clip, CB. :-) I'd almost forgotten how much I enjoyed Etre et Avoir and must now watch it again.
ReplyDeleteI know just waht you mean about people of a certain age sticking to the rules they learned at school, as i'm of that generation. However, judging by DD's exasperation at the way her elder son is being taught French, the problem of rule-bound French will soon be a thing of the past....
I confess, Perpetua, that when searching for the clip I was intrigued as to what those children are doing now, given that they must be coming to the end of their schooling. I have a very soft spot for little Jojo and wonder what kind of teenager he's turned out to be! I think language teaching in schools has suffered so much in recent years, with successive Governments meddling and making it compulsory or optional, and I just hope that, however it's taught, we WILL have some linguists in another 10 or 15 years time...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI was spurred on by this to go and have a look for Jojo and found this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.lamontagne.fr/auvergne/actualite/departement/puy-de-dome/puy-de-dome-local/2011/06/13/etre-et-avoir-dix-ans-apres-que-sont-ils-devenus-video-153695.html
Thanks so much for finding this, CB. It's very interesting to see that celebrity-chasing tourists can be as obnoxious in France as anywhere else, contrary to the perceptions of the rose-spectacled brigade. :-)
ReplyDeleteTrue...and that there's a question of after-effects on the participants of even the most well-meaning documentary!
ReplyDelete